Comments

• anonymous_Tibulti

  September 2011

  A few covers from MG :

  http://thenude.eu/covers.php?g=183&id=88855&an=2004&luna=09

  http://thenude.eu/covers.php?g=183&id=88889&an=2004&luna=12

  http://thenude.eu/covers.php?g=183&id=88901&an=2005&luna=01

  http://thenude.eu/covers.php?g=183&id=90359&an=2004&luna=04
• anonymous_J:-)

  February 2013

  I don't know the content - but the November 2005 cover is signed Murrian - and I don't see much resemblance with the Voronin-Sophie covers ... (?)
• Russell

  February 2013

  I don't know the content either and it's difficult to see just from the covers - anyone else?
• jack

  May 2013

  google gave me these.

  http://cache.sharenxs.com/images/wz/cab-/ag/ac/ah/ah/METMODELS_VOR_22_0000.jpg

  http://cache.sharenxs.com/images/wz/cab-/ag/ac/ah/ah/METMODELS_VOR_22_0013.jpg

  I don't think it's the same sophie.

  Pics above come from this site (popups!)

  http://setsdb.org/claudia-sophie-blush/
• jack

  May 2013

  whatever you decide, here is another cover from the same set as the metmodels one, though this cover is from multiple photographers, so no help there

  http://www.thenude.eu/covers.php?g=336&an=2003&luna=06

  Proof?

  Take one of the links in my previous post from the blush set and change the last number to 0021. It's almost the same pic.

  Now, you have this cover listed with 'jeka', and i have to admit, she does look very much like jeka, especially the 'tame the tiger' set.

  http://www.thenude.eu/Jeka_11274.htm.

  So my guess is, the metmodels cover (blush) already listed here with sophie, should go over to jeka (with a new alias for jeka).
• Russell

  May 2013

  jack - you make a convincing case but I'm going to keep them as they are - I know, a bit of a cop out - but until someone comes up with positive proof ie the original set, adding aka's to other model pages on the slim evidence of a cover...is the road to chaos! Hope you understand. (:R