It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Model page.
http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/
A new MET-Art photo set, by Arkisi, was released on January 9th 2013:
http://guests.met-art.com/guestCover/89CE1E93C9CD8BC4A594EF703936D491/
http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/gallery/20130109/KRONA/
She looks amazingly sexy covered in spilled milk!
METART: Margita Lesna (http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/)
INDEXXX: http://www.indexxx.com/models/73175/margita-lesna/
This woman is simply perfection.
Link to Margita's MET-ART Bastet gallery.
http://fhg.met-art.com/2013-04-04/Bastet/?pa=1305065
I agree with you completely pandion, Margita is gorgeous.
Now also on Domai as Innah, her first set dated 30 Sept.
http://domai.com/pics/index-models/index.html
As Innah with her first set at GoddessNudes dated tomorrow 31 October (http://goddessnudes.com/promotional/index.html)
I think it's the same girl, but without strong blur.
http://www.thenude.eu/Alla_27911.htm#Bio
Sorry, I think they are different. I can't find any mole match with Innah @ Domai/GN sets and Alla @ AA/SB galleries. Nose of Margita Lesna (Innah) is smaller and sharper than that of Alla. Anyway I'm not member of AA/SB. Wanting member's opinion.
I have two sets of AA/SB Alla. Both models have enough moles that you would expect some matches. But I can't see any matches...
Met-Art lists her as 5'7", not 5'9". Also, 170 cm equates to about 5'7".
Model pages:
http://access.domai.com/track/52.DM.18.117.17.0.0/model/innah
http://access.goddessnudes.com/track/52.GN.19.118.17.0.0/model/innah
https://nude-gals.com/model_page.php?model_id=497 http://peachy18.com/t/margita-lesna-met-art-403057/1.aspx https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Margita_Lesna https://www.elitebabes.com/model/margita-lesna/ http://www.eroticbeauties.net/model/margita-lesna/
Comments
Model page.
http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/
A new MET-Art photo set, by Arkisi, was released on January 9th 2013:
http://guests.met-art.com/guestCover/89CE1E93C9CD8BC4A594EF703936D491/
http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/gallery/20130109/KRONA/
She looks amazingly sexy covered in spilled milk!
METART: Margita Lesna (http://guests.met-art.com/model/margita-lesna/)
INDEXXX: http://www.indexxx.com/models/73175/margita-lesna/
This woman is simply perfection.
Link to Margita's MET-ART Bastet gallery.
http://fhg.met-art.com/2013-04-04/Bastet/?pa=1305065
I agree with you completely pandion, Margita is gorgeous.
Now also on Domai as Innah, her first set dated 30 Sept.
http://domai.com/pics/index-models/index.html
As Innah with her first set at GoddessNudes dated tomorrow 31 October (http://goddessnudes.com/promotional/index.html)
I think it's the same girl, but without strong blur.
http://www.thenude.eu/Alla_27911.htm#Bio
Sorry, I think they are different. I can't find any mole match with Innah @ Domai/GN sets and Alla @ AA/SB galleries. Nose of Margita Lesna (Innah) is smaller and sharper than that of Alla.
Anyway I'm not member of AA/SB. Wanting member's opinion.
I have two sets of AA/SB Alla. Both models have enough moles that you would expect some matches. But I can't see any matches...
Met-Art lists her as 5'7", not 5'9". Also, 170 cm equates to about 5'7".
Model pages:
http://access.domai.com/track/52.DM.18.117.17.0.0/model/innah
http://access.goddessnudes.com/track/52.GN.19.118.17.0.0/model/innah
https://nude-gals.com/model_page.php?model_id=497
http://peachy18.com/t/margita-lesna-met-art-403057/1.aspx
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Margita_Lesna
https://www.elitebabes.com/model/margita-lesna/
http://www.eroticbeauties.net/model/margita-lesna/